Car Reliability Ratings: Top Sources for Dependability Reports, auto reliability ratings.#Auto #reliability #ratings


Car Reliability Ratings:

Top Sources for Dependability Reports

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Car and Truck Reliability Ratings

There are several sources of automotive reliability ratings and opinions to choose from. Of course, none are perfect. So it’s best to compare reports, statistics and judgments of the bunch, and then lean toward the agreed-upon quality vehicles.

New Car Reviews

Reviews don’t usually tell us much about durability or the volume of repairs expected from a vehicle as mileage accumulates, aside from a few long-term road tests which you may find in publications such as Motor Trend, Truck Trend, Car and Driver and Road & Track. And you may have noticed that certain new car and truck reviews are basically advertisements (great reports on subpar vehicles to promote sales). But when you do come across an unbiased review, where a qualified automotive journalist is accurately critiquing a car or truck, stick with that writer and/or that publication.

Automotive Technicians

Aside from the carmaker’s engineers and executives examining the confidential warranty claim reports, no one knows how well vehicles hold up better than the automotive technicians at the dealership. These guys (and girls) know what breaks, how often, and which models to stay away from. The only problem is they typically work on a single brand. But if you’re deciding between two makes, and there is a joint dealer selling the two, go speak with a technician working on both. It doesn’t get any better than that. Technicians from independent auto repair shops can also be helpful, but they typically work on a high number of models which limits their expertise in any one make.

Auto reliability ratings Auto reliability ratingsAuto reliability ratings


Auto Reliability Ratings Supplier, Find Best Auto Reliability Ratings Supplier on, auto reliability ratings.#Auto #reliability #ratings


auto reliability ratings Suppliers

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Cooperate Logistics Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Qingdao Sainbo Auto Parts Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Fujian Jinlongteng Power Engine And Machinery Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Dongguan Hawking Led Lighting Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Shenzhen Youhong Technology Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Guangzhou BTD Car Tools Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Shenzhen Huiers Watch Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Dongguan Yuanyao Electronics Technology Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Shanghai Lead Glass Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Changchun Sunshine Automotive Component Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Hangzhou Noelift Equipment Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Guangzhou Lvyuan Water Purification Equipment Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Ruian Zhengjie EFI Technology Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Guangzhou Guanyuan Zhiyou Auto Parts City Adis Auto Parts Firm

Auto reliability ratings

APT Prosper Technology Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Nanchang Alex Electric Factory

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Shenzhen Excellent Top Electronics Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Zhangqiu Meihua International Trading Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Hunan S and S New Energy Tech Co., Limited

Auto reliability ratings

Shenzhen Yidashun Technology Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

KONG SING TRADING

Auto reliability ratings

Henan Hongxing Mining Machinery Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

ALCO PREVENTION CANADA INC

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Wenzhou Winco Imp Exp Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Nanpi County Tai Xin Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Guangzhou Weshare Auto Parts Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Yangzhou Dongtai Solar Energy Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Dalian Kawaritsu Precision Machinery Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Anping County Baiyi Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings


Japanese Autos Lose Ground in Consumer Reports’ Reliability Ratings, auto reliability ratings.#Auto #reliability #ratings


The New York Times

Auto reliability ratings

After results of Consumer Reports Annual Auto Reliability ratings were released on Monday, there appeared to be a crack in the dominance of Japanese brands over automotive reliability. Two of America’s most popular cars, the V-6-equipped Honda Accord and the Nissan Altima, no longer have the consumer advocacy publication’s coveted “Recommended” rating, according to the report.

The 2014 Subaru Forester was the highest-scoring vehicle over all in predicted reliability. Worst-rated was the Ford C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid. The Dodge Dart 2-liter was the top domestic model. After performing poorly in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s new, more stringent small overlap front crash test, the Audi A4, the Toyota Camry, the Toyota RAV4 and the Toyota Prius V were also absent from the list.

The results of Consumer Reports’ annual survey, which tries to highlight the most reliable 2014 vehicles by evaluating past years’ models, were released in Detroit during a news conference before members of the Automotive Press Association. The report is based on data from 1.1 million 2004-13 model-year vehicles leased or owned by Consumer Reports subscribers. Subscribers were asked whether, in the last year, they had a serious problem with their vehicle that required a visit to the dealer.

To determine predicted reliability, the publication’s staff averages the overall reliability scores for the most recent three model years, assuming that a given model has not changed during that period and was not redesigned for 2013. If it were, Consumer Reports may use one or two years of data to calculate a rating.

At first glance, the slipping reliability stances of Japanese vehicles do not seem significant. After all, seven of the top 10 spots in the brand rankings are still held by Japanese brands, with Lexus in first place, followed by Toyota, Acura, Mazda, Infiniti, Honda and Subaru. That is only one less than last year.

But the slip in stature emerges upon closer inspection of the data. Along with the rankings of the Accord V-6 and Altima, the twin models shared by Scion and Subaru, the Scion FR-S and Subaru BRZ, scored below average in predicted reliability and were responsible for Scion falling from first place last year to 11th this year, and for Subaru falling from fifth to 10th.

“On the whole, Japanese brands are still more reliable than Europeans or Americans,” said Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, in a telephone interview. “But we are talking about an Accord, Altima, Pathfinder, FR-S and BRZ, all below average. That’s something that’s kind of new.”

Also, Nissan fell nine places from last year to its current 22nd out of 28 brands.

“We aren’t used to seeing Japanese nameplates being that low on the list,” he said, adding that most European manufacturers had improved.

The prime example is Audi, which rose four places from last year to take 4th place. It was the top European manufacturer in the survey. The A6 sedan, the Q7 sport utility and the Allroad wagon all had “much better than average” reliability. Mr. Fisher said that it was rare to see a non-Japanese automaker among the top five.

Volvo jumped 13 places this year to seventh. GMC, a brand with only trucks, moved up three places to finish ninth, making it the only domestic brand in the top 10.

These are some of the other conclusions from the survey:

In-car electronics, including audio, navigation, communication and connected systems, continue to be a problem. The category that includes in-car electronics generated “significantly” more complaints than any of the 17 categories of problem areas in the survey, Mr. Fisher said. Complaints include issues with screen freezes, touch-control lag, voice recognition malfunctions and compatibility problems with cellphones and MP3 devices.

Almost two-thirds of the 34 Ford and Lincoln models in the survey scored much worse than “Average,” which is the lowest rating. In-car electronics is one reason those models occupy the bottom of the list (26th for Ford and 27th for Lincoln).The brands have fallen the last few years because of problems with the MyFord and MyLincoln Touch infotainment systems.

Ford continued to have problems with its 6-speed dual-clutch PowerShift transmissions as well, Mr. Fisher said.

In this year’s survey, several of Ford’s EcoBoost turbocharged V-6 models have poor predicted reliability ratings as well.

“In every example where there is a non-EcoBoost engine, the models with the EcoBoost engines tend to have worse reliability than the ones that don’t have those engines,” Mr. Fisher said, adding that it was too early to tell whether those issues are because of the EcoBoost engine or other factors. “That is true throughout their lineup.”

EcoBoost engines, which come in a variety of sizes, are crucial to Ford, which planned to have more than 90 percent of its North American lineup available with the fuel-efficient turbocharged engines by this year.

The Tesla Model S electric car did well enough in the survey to earn a Recommended rating for the first time based on data from more than 600 2012-13 models. Although owners of 2012 models reported very few problems, 2013 owners reported “quite a few” more, according to the Consumer Reports survey. Those problems included wind noise, squeaks and rattles, and problems with body hardware, like sunroofs, doors and locks.

General Motors fared better than other domestic brands over all.

Chrysler continued to perform poorly, with the exception of the Chrysler 300C, which scored above average in this year’s survey.

Hybrids and electric cars continued to do well, with the exception of the Ford Fusion Hybrid, the Ford C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid and the Ford C-Max Hybrid.

BMW and Mercedes-Benz models were in the middle of the field, with most models receiving scores of average or better.


Consumer Reports 2016 auto reliability survey results, auto reliability ratings.#Auto #reliability #ratings


Consumer Reports 2016 auto reliability survey: A few surprises amid the standbys

October 25, 2016

  • Facebook
  • Tweet
  • Pinterest
  • Email

Consumer Reports has released the results of its 2016 Auto Reliability Survey. While the annual report doesn t rank vehicles based on what enthusiasts want in four-wheel transportation — as its name suggests, it s all about reliability and predictability — it probably plays a big role in how your neighbor who doesn t care at all about cars will make his next auto-buying decision.

This year, there s some of the expected shuffling of brand rankings common as new products and technologies enter the market and older products get perfected, plus a few totally predictable results. To the shock of no one, Toyota and Lexus topped the list thanks to their conservative, evolutionary approach to vehicle production (though in the case of the latter marque, not necessarily exterior styling).

There are a few surprises, as well. Subaru slipped from the top-10 brands over serious Legacy and Outback recalls and WRX reliability concerns. Notably, Buick moved into third place, a first for an American automaker.

It was a mixed bag for other GM offerings, with Chevrolet cars tending to fare better than Chevy or GMC trucks. It s even worse for Fiat-Chrysler. Out of a lineup spanning Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat, Jeep, Maserati and Ram, only the Chrysler 300 got the CR nod of approval. FCA nameplates tend to fill out the bottom of the brand reliability rankings, along with . Tesla.

Speaking of Tesla, the Model S, which has (somewhat confusingly) been all over the place in CR s rankings, has swung back into recommended territory. Yet the complicated, malfunction-prone Model X remains off the list.

Not a single Jaguar-Land Rover product made it, which highlights another caveat with the report: CR s list isn t necessarily predictive of sales. JLR vehicles have never been known for sterling reliability, yet people keep buying them. 2016 is shaping up to be a good year for the company and its cars, recommended status or not.

Auto reliability ratings

Car News

Sports car sales fall as baby boomers grow up

DETROIT — Baby boomers in the U.S. are starting to outgrow their midlife crisis years, and that s bad news for automakers who want to sell sports cars.It was a sign of things to come this month .

The all-new Honda Civic didn t earn a recommendation this time around; this situation parallels that of the last-all new Civic, which Consumer Reports sharply criticized after its debut in 2011. In the new car s case, this seems to be tied to a frustrating touchscreen-based infotainment system, driving safety tech and, curiously, lack of availability of certain configurations at dealerships (how that is a reliability concern is beyond us). Perhaps a fix is already in the works: The upcoming 2017 CR-V adds a volume knob to its infotainment system, likely a response to persistent griping from reviewers and buyers alike.

Auto reliability ratings

Graham Kozak – Graham Kozak drove a 1951 Packard 200 sedan in high school because he wanted something that would be easy to find in a parking lot. He thinks all the things they’re doing with fuel injection and seatbelts these days are pretty nifty too.


Car Reliability by Manufacturer: History of Auto Maker Dependability, auto reliability ratings.#Auto #reliability #ratings


Car Reliability by Region (Manufacturer):

History of Auto Maker Dependability

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Which Makes Hold Up the Best?

Reliability has always been a relative subject as automotive manufacturers differ in quality of design, assembly and materials. However, in the opinion of our editors, some basics have held true for quite some time. Keep in mind that these are general observations, and carmakers with lesser reputations do come out with dependable models, and vice versa:

European

European manufacturers have held the upper hand in luxury and performance. Fit, finish and quality materials have produced some very impressive cars. But initial quality does not always hold up well over time, as a result, a lot of European models are thought to be susceptible to a higher than average number of repairs. And the higher cost of some imported parts can make things worse.

American

The big three U.S. automakers have their hands full right now. Economical upheavals have been brought on by factors such as too many models to produce efficiently, past disregard of the need for economically greener cars, and extreme labor costs (UAW). Quality and reliability of American made automobiles had already been a topic. There was a significant downturn following the late 60s muscle car era, but over the last decade we have seen improvement. Ford Motor Company seems to have a jump on the pack.

Auto reliability ratings Auto reliability ratings

Consumer Reports 2016 auto reliability survey results, auto reliability ratings.#Auto #reliability #ratings


Consumer Reports 2016 auto reliability survey: A few surprises amid the standbys

October 25, 2016

  • Facebook
  • Tweet
  • Pinterest
  • Email

Consumer Reports has released the results of its 2016 Auto Reliability Survey. While the annual report doesn t rank vehicles based on what enthusiasts want in four-wheel transportation — as its name suggests, it s all about reliability and predictability — it probably plays a big role in how your neighbor who doesn t care at all about cars will make his next auto-buying decision.

This year, there s some of the expected shuffling of brand rankings common as new products and technologies enter the market and older products get perfected, plus a few totally predictable results. To the shock of no one, Toyota and Lexus topped the list thanks to their conservative, evolutionary approach to vehicle production (though in the case of the latter marque, not necessarily exterior styling).

There are a few surprises, as well. Subaru slipped from the top-10 brands over serious Legacy and Outback recalls and WRX reliability concerns. Notably, Buick moved into third place, a first for an American automaker.

It was a mixed bag for other GM offerings, with Chevrolet cars tending to fare better than Chevy or GMC trucks. It s even worse for Fiat-Chrysler. Out of a lineup spanning Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat, Jeep, Maserati and Ram, only the Chrysler 300 got the CR nod of approval. FCA nameplates tend to fill out the bottom of the brand reliability rankings, along with . Tesla.

Speaking of Tesla, the Model S, which has (somewhat confusingly) been all over the place in CR s rankings, has swung back into recommended territory. Yet the complicated, malfunction-prone Model X remains off the list.

Not a single Jaguar-Land Rover product made it, which highlights another caveat with the report: CR s list isn t necessarily predictive of sales. JLR vehicles have never been known for sterling reliability, yet people keep buying them. 2016 is shaping up to be a good year for the company and its cars, recommended status or not.

Auto reliability ratings

Car News

Sports car sales fall as baby boomers grow up

DETROIT — Baby boomers in the U.S. are starting to outgrow their midlife crisis years, and that s bad news for automakers who want to sell sports cars.It was a sign of things to come this month .

The all-new Honda Civic didn t earn a recommendation this time around; this situation parallels that of the last-all new Civic, which Consumer Reports sharply criticized after its debut in 2011. In the new car s case, this seems to be tied to a frustrating touchscreen-based infotainment system, driving safety tech and, curiously, lack of availability of certain configurations at dealerships (how that is a reliability concern is beyond us). Perhaps a fix is already in the works: The upcoming 2017 CR-V adds a volume knob to its infotainment system, likely a response to persistent griping from reviewers and buyers alike.

Auto reliability ratings

Graham Kozak – Graham Kozak drove a 1951 Packard 200 sedan in high school because he wanted something that would be easy to find in a parking lot. He thinks all the things they’re doing with fuel injection and seatbelts these days are pretty nifty too.


Car Reliability Comparisons #auto #repair #insurance


#auto comparison
#

Compare Car Reliability

No idea which car models you might be interested in? Find candidates in our car model search .

More Reliability Information

Why TrueDelta’s Car Reliability Information is Better

You won’t find car reliability information like this anywhere else. Actual repair frequencies, not just vague dots, to make it clear how much car models truly differ in reliability.

Elsewhere you’ll find only averages, which might not tell you what you really want to know. So we also report the percentage of cars with no repairs at all in the past year and the percentage of lemons. These figures might surprise you.

All of these stats are promptly updated four times a year. So TrueDelta can have reliability ratings on new car models well ahead of any other source and then track cars much more closely as they age.

Others tell you how reliable a car was a year ago, when it was a year younger and had 12,000 fewer miles on it. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable a car model has been recently.

Want to really get into the details? We also post the description of every reported repair, as car repair histories.

Please join us and help make this information possible.


Car Reliability Comparisons #auto #parts #cheap


#auto comparison
#

Compare Car Reliability

No idea which car models you might be interested in? Find candidates in our car model search .

More Reliability Information

Why TrueDelta’s Car Reliability Information is Better

You won’t find car reliability information like this anywhere else. Actual repair frequencies, not just vague dots, to make it clear how much car models truly differ in reliability.

Elsewhere you’ll find only averages, which might not tell you what you really want to know. So we also report the percentage of cars with no repairs at all in the past year and the percentage of lemons. These figures might surprise you.

All of these stats are promptly updated four times a year. So TrueDelta can have reliability ratings on new car models well ahead of any other source and then track cars much more closely as they age.

Others tell you how reliable a car was a year ago, when it was a year younger and had 12,000 fewer miles on it. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable a car model has been recently.

Want to really get into the details? We also post the description of every reported repair, as car repair histories.

Please join us and help make this information possible.


Car Reliability Comparisons #best #extended #auto #warranty


#auto comparison
#

Compare Car Reliability

No idea which car models you might be interested in? Find candidates in our car model search .

More Reliability Information

Why TrueDelta’s Car Reliability Information is Better

You won’t find car reliability information like this anywhere else. Actual repair frequencies, not just vague dots, to make it clear how much car models truly differ in reliability.

Elsewhere you’ll find only averages, which might not tell you what you really want to know. So we also report the percentage of cars with no repairs at all in the past year and the percentage of lemons. These figures might surprise you.

All of these stats are promptly updated four times a year. So TrueDelta can have reliability ratings on new car models well ahead of any other source and then track cars much more closely as they age.

Others tell you how reliable a car was a year ago, when it was a year younger and had 12,000 fewer miles on it. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable a car model has been recently.

Want to really get into the details? We also post the description of every reported repair, as car repair histories.

Please join us and help make this information possible.