Car Reliability Ratings: Top Sources for Dependability Reports, auto reliability ratings.#Auto #reliability #ratings

Car Reliability Ratings:

Top Sources for Dependability Reports

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Car and Truck Reliability Ratings

There are several sources of automotive reliability ratings and opinions to choose from. Of course, none are perfect. So it’s best to compare reports, statistics and judgments of the bunch, and then lean toward the agreed-upon quality vehicles.

New Car Reviews

Reviews don’t usually tell us much about durability or the volume of repairs expected from a vehicle as mileage accumulates, aside from a few long-term road tests which you may find in publications such as Motor Trend, Truck Trend, Car and Driver and Road & Track. And you may have noticed that certain new car and truck reviews are basically advertisements (great reports on subpar vehicles to promote sales). But when you do come across an unbiased review, where a qualified automotive journalist is accurately critiquing a car or truck, stick with that writer and/or that publication.

Automotive Technicians

Aside from the carmaker’s engineers and executives examining the confidential warranty claim reports, no one knows how well vehicles hold up better than the automotive technicians at the dealership. These guys (and girls) know what breaks, how often, and which models to stay away from. The only problem is they typically work on a single brand. But if you’re deciding between two makes, and there is a joint dealer selling the two, go speak with a technician working on both. It doesn’t get any better than that. Technicians from independent auto repair shops can also be helpful, but they typically work on a high number of models which limits their expertise in any one make.

Auto reliability ratings Auto reliability ratingsAuto reliability ratings

Crash Tests and Safety Ratings: What Does It All Mean, auto safety ratings.#Auto #safety #ratings

Crash Tests and Safety Ratings:

What Does It All Mean?

Subscribe to our blog

Car commercials often tout crash test safety ratings and expect us to be impressed. But how do cars get those ratings and do they actually translate to real-life collisions? Join us as we figure it all out.

Who conducts crash testing?

In the United States, both the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) conduct crash tests to determine structural integrity and the risk of injury to drivers and passengers. Both are valid sources, but their tests differ, so it pays to give them both a closer look.

NHTSA crash tests

The NHTSA uses crash test dummies to test front, side, and rollover crashes. The car can receive 1 to 5 stars for each test based on the chance of serious injury to specific parts of the body.

Frontal impact crash tests

This test measures the force of impact after a vehicle crashes head-on into a fixed barrier (which represents another car of the same size) at 35 mph.

In a side impact test, a sedan-sized barrier moving at 38.5 mph T-bones a non-moving vehicle. Injury to both front and back seat occupants (i.e. crash test dummies) is measured.

These determine how well the car prevents occupant ejection in a rollover and how well it protects non-ejected occupants (think roof crushability).

New crash test criteria

In 2011, the NHTSA began conducting more stringent crash tests. The revised tests added some new features, such as:

  • A side impact test to simulate a crash into a telephone pole or tree
  • Crash test dummies of different sizes (after all, people come in all shapes and sizes)
  • Identifying advanced crash avoidance features (though these don’t actually factor into the car’s score)
  • Injury assessment on additional parts of the body

Plus, the new system now includes an overall safety rating, making it easier for you to assess a vehicle s safety at a glance. But keep in mind that if you’re comparing a new car to an older model, their safety ratings can’t be measured side by side.

IIHS crash tests

Rather than conducting the same crash tests as the NHTSA, the IIHS looks at other factors that could affect crashworthiness. The 2 agencies complement each other to give a fuller picture of a car’s safety. So, when you re shopping for a new car, consider both safety ratings.

Frontal offset crash tests

The IIHS places one average-sized adult male dummy in the front seat and crashes one side of the front end at 40 mph. Why one side? Because the IIHS believes that in real collisions, most drivers try to avoid the incident by turning, thus only one side of the front is impacted.

To offset the government’s side impact test (which uses a sedan-simulated barrier), the IIHS uses a barrier with the height and shape of a typical SUV or pickup. They also use smaller dummies since shorter drivers are more likely to suffer head injuries during these types of crashes.

Other tests the IIHS conducts

  • Roof strength
  • Rear crash protection/head restraint ratings
  • Electronic stability control
  • Bumper evaluations

How crash test ratings translate to real-world performance

According to the IIHS, an occupant in a car rated “good” is 46 percent less likely to die in a frontal crash than a driver of a vehicle rated “poor.” A driver of a car rated “acceptable” or “marginal” is 33 percent less likely to die than a driver of a poorly rated one.

The results are similar for side impact tests. A driver of a car rated “good” is 70 percent less likely to die in a left-side crash than a driver of a car rated “poor.” And drivers of cars rated “acceptable” or “marginal” are 64 percent and 49 percent less likely to die, respectively.

It’s hard to argue with the math. Safety ratings make a difference. But don t forget, these ratings are usually based on accidents between cars of a similar size. Crashes between cars of different sizes are a whole different ballgame. For more facts and info on how the size of your car can impact your safety during a crash, read how car size translates to car safety.

Safety Ratings Explained, ANCAP, auto safety ratings.#Auto #safety #ratings

ANCAP Safety Ratings Explained.

Compare these three vehicles, all crash tested at 64 km/h.

Auto safety ratings

Auto safety ratings

Auto safety ratings

ANCAP safety ratings are published using a rating system of 1 to 5 stars. These star ratings indicate the level of safety a vehicle provides for occupants and pedestrians in the event of a crash, as well as its ability – through technology – to avoid a crash.

ANCAP safety ratings are determined based on a series of internationally recognised, independent crash tests and safety assessments.

In all physical crash tests, dummies are used to measure the forces and likely injuries a driver, passenger or pedestrian may sustain during a crash. Observations are also made on the displacement of dummies during the crash, as well as the structural impact on the vehicle s occupant compartment. Vehicles must achieve minimum scores across all physical crash tests (for each ANCAP safety rating level), as well as meet minimum requirements for the inclusion of safety equipment and technologies.

ANCAP crash tests are conducted on new passenger and light commercial vehicles entering the Australian and New Zealand markets with each model assessed under identical testing standards and conditions. ANCAP safety ratings can be used to compare the relative safety between cars of similar mass.

To achieve the maximum 5 star ANCAP safety rating, a vehicle must perform to the highest level across all crash tests and assessments.

So the more stars, the safer we’ll be?

The diagrams below show typical injuries to the driver and passenger for each ANCAP safety rating based on the frontal offset test conducted at 64 km/h.

Latest ANCAP Safety Ratings

Auto safety ratings

How to Check Car Safety Ratings, Edmunds, auto safety ratings.#Auto #safety #ratings

How to Check Car Safety Ratings

Every year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) conducts crash tests on new vehicles and reports their performance on its Web site. For the 2015 model year, the agency will rate nearly 89 percent of the new model year vehicles under its 5-Star Safety Rating program.

Auto safety ratings

NHTSA says its crash tests of 74 2012 model-year vehicles will provide information on about 81 percent of 2012 model-year passenger vehicles sold in the United States.

Auto safety ratings

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety in 2011 tested two innovative cars: the all-electric Nissan Leaf and the plug-in hybrid Chevrolet Volt.

Auto safety ratings

NHTSA has added a small female dummy to its crash tests to better represent what would happen to a smaller adult female or a child in an accident.

Auto safety ratings

NHTSA says its crash tests of 74 2012 model-year vehicles will provide information on about 81 percent of 2012 model-year passenger vehicles sold in the United States.

Auto safety ratings

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety in 2011 tested two innovative cars: the all-electric Nissan Leaf and the plug-in hybrid Chevrolet Volt.

Auto safety ratings

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), a private nonprofit organization funded by automobile insurance companies and insurance associations, conducts its own testing program and issues its own ratings. NHTSA and IIHS conduct different tests, and neither organization tests all cars on the market. But they do test the volume sellers. IIHS also made it a point in 2011 to test such innovative cars as the all-electric Nissan Leaf and the plug-in hybrid Chevrolet Volt. NHTSA, in turn, tested the 2013 Tesla Model S, which led to a dust-up over the Tesla’s claims about the vehicle’s safety superiority.

Here are NHTSA’s Five-Star safety ratings. Note that you can’t compare 1990-2010 vehicles with those from 2011 forward. Starting with 2011 models, NHTSA introduced tougher tests and new ratings in its Five-Star system. The agency says they provide more information about vehicle safety and crash-avoidance technologies.

The IIHS ratings page includes the testing information for individual cars. You can see which vehicles earned IIHS’s Top Safety Pick designation.

Carroll leads the team of Edmunds writers who help people understand how to more easily buy and lease cars. She’s a career journalist who hopes to own a vintage VW Beetle someday.

Car Insurance Rates Mobile Form, auto insurance ratings.#Auto #insurance #ratings

Car Insurance On-The-Go

Comparing car insurance rates online is easier than ever with our handy new mobile app. You can still get the same benefit you get from the normal version of our site by entering your ZIP code above, which will allow you to compare specialized offers from major national insurance providers and local agents in your area. Gone are the days when you had to call one carrier after another – has done all the heavy lifting for you! Just enter your ZIP code in the box above to see what our participating providers have in store for you.

Expert Insurance Guides

Need help picking the right options? Not sure what the various industry terms mean? We’ve got your back! is chalk-full of helpful guides, useful tips, and article after article of informative information, complete with charts, checklists, and case study to help you make the best decision when selecting your policy type or end-provider.

State-by-State Requirements

Locality is one of the top factors that will influence what you can or can’t do with your car insurance policy. Laws, rules, and regulations changes all the time, and it’s our mission to try and keep you as up-to-date with pertinent information so you can make the right choice when selecting you coverage levels or provider.

Ask a Question, Get an Answer

Still need help getting to the bottom of your insurance situation? We have an easy-to-use library of questions-and-answers from current clients, with a wide range of solutions that even shocks us on occasion. No matter how obscure your query seems to be, don’t fret – we can help point you in the right direction of the information you need.

Visit the Full Site

Is our mobile display just not doing it for you? We have the fully-loaded, live version of our site standing by. Just click the link below to view the site as though you were on a desktop machine.

800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100, Seattle, WA 98104

Auto Insurance Rates, auto insurance ratings.#Auto #insurance #ratings

Auto Insurance Rates

We make it easy to save money while enjoying great coverage.

Are You Paying Too Much?

Chances are, you are spending more than you should on car insurance. Countless companies promise to offer the best rates, making it difficult to know if you are truly getting a good deal. Maybe you have been with a company for a long time and haven’t thought about potential savings you may be missing out on. Regardless of your situation, we encourage you to use our free service to compare car insurance quotes from leading providers. We make it easy to find a new policy or change your coverage so you get maximum protection at the best price. Instead of spending a significant amount of time and effort researching different policies and types of protection, you can easily learn more about protecting your vehicle and compare quotes in one spot.

Our Simple Method

The average consumer is inundated with television and mailer advertisements from auto insurers promising savings of different magnitudes, simply by switching to their brand. While they may save some customers money, how can you be sure they will offer you the best deal while giving you adequate protection? We go beyond the hype and commercial appeals to deliver you accurate quotes, tailored to your specified needs. Complete one simple, secure application form and you will receive the best rates from a variety of providers, with absolutely no obligation to buy. You will have the ability to compare plans and choose the one that will serve you best. We have streamlined the application process and have taken the guesswork out of researching policies, types of coverage and annual premiums!

Featured Articles

What to Look for in a Policy

If you are looking to get a new plan or update the one you already have, we encourage you to learn more about the different options available before choosing. Learn why timing isn’t everything when looking to cancel and why your state regulations are important to know.

Learn How We Can Help You Lower Your Premiums

Forget the days of having to get a pad of paper and a pencil to begin the intense process of tracking down a reputable agent. We make it easy to compare quotes using your computer, tablet or mobile device. Learn what to look for in an estimate to ensure it is a good deal.

How You Can Get the Best Deal on a Policy

Finding an affordable plan shouldn’t be strenuous. You have all of the tools at your disposal to get the best deal available. Learn some helpful strategies and build a policy that accommodates your needs and adequately protects you and your loved ones for a reasonable price.

Selecting a reputable company is one of the most important things you can do. Look at unbiased, side by side analysis of top companies to make an educated decision when it comes to choosing a plan.

From qualifying for discounts and managing coverage to filing claims, you can learn more about working with your provider to ensure you get the best service and are treated fairly throughout the agreement period.

Do you know what types of coverage are essential and others that may be optional? It doesn’t matter what kind of vehicle you drive, we can help you build a plan that offers adequate protection on the roads at all time. Regardless of what auto insurance companies are trying to sell you, we recommend you review different products to make sure your needs are met.

There are simple measures you can take to reduce the likelihood of an accident or incident. We have included valuable safety tips and maintenance suggestions to protect you while on the road and prolong the life of your car or truck.

All rights reserved.

are the property of their respective holders.

Auto Reliability Ratings Supplier, Find Best Auto Reliability Ratings Supplier on, auto reliability ratings.#Auto #reliability #ratings

auto reliability ratings Suppliers

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Cooperate Logistics Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Qingdao Sainbo Auto Parts Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Fujian Jinlongteng Power Engine And Machinery Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Dongguan Hawking Led Lighting Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Shenzhen Youhong Technology Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Guangzhou BTD Car Tools Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Shenzhen Huiers Watch Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Dongguan Yuanyao Electronics Technology Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Shanghai Lead Glass Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Changchun Sunshine Automotive Component Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Hangzhou Noelift Equipment Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Guangzhou Lvyuan Water Purification Equipment Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Ruian Zhengjie EFI Technology Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Guangzhou Guanyuan Zhiyou Auto Parts City Adis Auto Parts Firm

Auto reliability ratings

APT Prosper Technology Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Nanchang Alex Electric Factory

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Shenzhen Excellent Top Electronics Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Zhangqiu Meihua International Trading Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Hunan S and S New Energy Tech Co., Limited

Auto reliability ratings

Shenzhen Yidashun Technology Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings


Auto reliability ratings

Henan Hongxing Mining Machinery Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings


Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

Wenzhou Winco Imp Exp Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Nanpi County Tai Xin Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Guangzhou Weshare Auto Parts Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Yangzhou Dongtai Solar Energy Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Dalian Kawaritsu Precision Machinery Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Anping County Baiyi Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd.

Auto reliability ratings

Auto reliability ratings

How Will Auto Safety Ratings Change In The Future, auto safety ratings.#Auto #safety #ratings

How Will Auto Safety Ratings Change In The Future?

Email This Page

Car safety has evolved at a rapid pace—a pace that likely wouldn’t be what it is if it weren’t so carefully monitored by two major safety agencies in the U.S.

They’re the federal government’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which oversees NCAP testing, and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), a group that’s funded by the insurance industry. Together, they strive to have a safer vehicle fleet, with fewer accidents and fatalities.

While the IIHS has introduced new tests in recent years, like the small overlap frontal test and dynamic testing for front crash prevention—as well as tightened its requirements to earn its Top Safety Pick+ award—the federal ratings and tests haven’t seen a major rehab since 2010.

Auto safety ratings

NHTSA 5-star safety ratings timeline

And during that time, much has changed. For instance, active-safety systems are no longer curiosities available only on some of the most expensive luxury sedans.

Here’s how the federal government will update its five-star safety program over the next several years:

  • Introduce a new crash test
  • Use “more human-like” crash dummies
  • Rate crash-avoidance technologies
  • Assess pedestrian protection

The new crash test is a frontal oblique one that will measure occupant protection in angled frontal crashes. It should be an effective complement to the IIHS small overlap frontal test, and provide a new vehicle-structure challenge for automakers.

Auto safety ratings

Vince and Larry, the crash-test dummies

In addition to that, the federal government will improve its full frontal barrier test to assess the safety of back-seat occupants. And a new, more biofidelic test dummy design will provide more information on forces, and thus injury risk.

Neither the timeline nor the requirements themselves are yet laid down as law; they’re under a comment period until February 16, 2016.

As for the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the other major U.S. safety agency that conducts crash-testing, don’t be surprised if it tightens some of the requirements for its existing crash tests in the near future.

Aligned on emergency braking

One area of future focus in which the federal government and the IIHS agree is on the need for automatic emergency braking (AEB) systems. And with the two agencies aligned on this issue, we anticipate within jsust a few years, he vast majority of new vehicles will be sold with automatic-braking capability.

“We are entering a new era of vehicle safety, focused on preventing crashes from ever occurring, rather than just protecting occupants when crashes happen,“ said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, in a joint statement earlier this year. “But if technologies such as automatic emergency braking are only available as options or on the most expensive models, too few Americans will see the benefits of this new era.”

These systems use cameras, radar, lasers, or a combination of these technologies to help detect an imminent crash, warn the driver, and then intervene by engaging the brakes—to either prevent the accident or reduce its severity—if the driver doesn’t react.

Japanese Autos Lose Ground in Consumer Reports’ Reliability Ratings, auto reliability ratings.#Auto #reliability #ratings

The New York Times

Auto reliability ratings

After results of Consumer Reports Annual Auto Reliability ratings were released on Monday, there appeared to be a crack in the dominance of Japanese brands over automotive reliability. Two of America’s most popular cars, the V-6-equipped Honda Accord and the Nissan Altima, no longer have the consumer advocacy publication’s coveted “Recommended” rating, according to the report.

The 2014 Subaru Forester was the highest-scoring vehicle over all in predicted reliability. Worst-rated was the Ford C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid. The Dodge Dart 2-liter was the top domestic model. After performing poorly in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s new, more stringent small overlap front crash test, the Audi A4, the Toyota Camry, the Toyota RAV4 and the Toyota Prius V were also absent from the list.

The results of Consumer Reports’ annual survey, which tries to highlight the most reliable 2014 vehicles by evaluating past years’ models, were released in Detroit during a news conference before members of the Automotive Press Association. The report is based on data from 1.1 million 2004-13 model-year vehicles leased or owned by Consumer Reports subscribers. Subscribers were asked whether, in the last year, they had a serious problem with their vehicle that required a visit to the dealer.

To determine predicted reliability, the publication’s staff averages the overall reliability scores for the most recent three model years, assuming that a given model has not changed during that period and was not redesigned for 2013. If it were, Consumer Reports may use one or two years of data to calculate a rating.

At first glance, the slipping reliability stances of Japanese vehicles do not seem significant. After all, seven of the top 10 spots in the brand rankings are still held by Japanese brands, with Lexus in first place, followed by Toyota, Acura, Mazda, Infiniti, Honda and Subaru. That is only one less than last year.

But the slip in stature emerges upon closer inspection of the data. Along with the rankings of the Accord V-6 and Altima, the twin models shared by Scion and Subaru, the Scion FR-S and Subaru BRZ, scored below average in predicted reliability and were responsible for Scion falling from first place last year to 11th this year, and for Subaru falling from fifth to 10th.

“On the whole, Japanese brands are still more reliable than Europeans or Americans,” said Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, in a telephone interview. “But we are talking about an Accord, Altima, Pathfinder, FR-S and BRZ, all below average. That’s something that’s kind of new.”

Also, Nissan fell nine places from last year to its current 22nd out of 28 brands.

“We aren’t used to seeing Japanese nameplates being that low on the list,” he said, adding that most European manufacturers had improved.

The prime example is Audi, which rose four places from last year to take 4th place. It was the top European manufacturer in the survey. The A6 sedan, the Q7 sport utility and the Allroad wagon all had “much better than average” reliability. Mr. Fisher said that it was rare to see a non-Japanese automaker among the top five.

Volvo jumped 13 places this year to seventh. GMC, a brand with only trucks, moved up three places to finish ninth, making it the only domestic brand in the top 10.

These are some of the other conclusions from the survey:

In-car electronics, including audio, navigation, communication and connected systems, continue to be a problem. The category that includes in-car electronics generated “significantly” more complaints than any of the 17 categories of problem areas in the survey, Mr. Fisher said. Complaints include issues with screen freezes, touch-control lag, voice recognition malfunctions and compatibility problems with cellphones and MP3 devices.

Almost two-thirds of the 34 Ford and Lincoln models in the survey scored much worse than “Average,” which is the lowest rating. In-car electronics is one reason those models occupy the bottom of the list (26th for Ford and 27th for Lincoln).The brands have fallen the last few years because of problems with the MyFord and MyLincoln Touch infotainment systems.

Ford continued to have problems with its 6-speed dual-clutch PowerShift transmissions as well, Mr. Fisher said.

In this year’s survey, several of Ford’s EcoBoost turbocharged V-6 models have poor predicted reliability ratings as well.

“In every example where there is a non-EcoBoost engine, the models with the EcoBoost engines tend to have worse reliability than the ones that don’t have those engines,” Mr. Fisher said, adding that it was too early to tell whether those issues are because of the EcoBoost engine or other factors. “That is true throughout their lineup.”

EcoBoost engines, which come in a variety of sizes, are crucial to Ford, which planned to have more than 90 percent of its North American lineup available with the fuel-efficient turbocharged engines by this year.

The Tesla Model S electric car did well enough in the survey to earn a Recommended rating for the first time based on data from more than 600 2012-13 models. Although owners of 2012 models reported very few problems, 2013 owners reported “quite a few” more, according to the Consumer Reports survey. Those problems included wind noise, squeaks and rattles, and problems with body hardware, like sunroofs, doors and locks.

General Motors fared better than other domestic brands over all.

Chrysler continued to perform poorly, with the exception of the Chrysler 300C, which scored above average in this year’s survey.

Hybrids and electric cars continued to do well, with the exception of the Ford Fusion Hybrid, the Ford C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid and the Ford C-Max Hybrid.

BMW and Mercedes-Benz models were in the middle of the field, with most models receiving scores of average or better.